The Making of the Hudson River School

The Making of the Hudson River School

Introduction

This exhibition originated from the frequently asked question “what is the Hudson River School?” We can begin with three basic facts.

First, the Hudson River School refers to American landscape painting created between 1825 and roughly 1875.

Second, the Hudson River School was not an actual school, but a group of artists who mainly lived and painted in the Hudson River valley of New York. They frequently knew one another, went on sketching trips together, and exhibited their paintings side by side at exhibitions and galleries.

Third, the name Hudson River School was not used by the artists themselves. The name came into general use in the 1870s, at a time when their style was losing popularity.

In addition to these three statements, this exhibition reveals that much more went into the making of the Hudson River School, such as the influence of European traditions and cultural movements, as well as America’s natural environment and commercial spirit. The Hudson River School also emerged alongside the new medium of photography, the new science of geology, and new technologies that transformed travel and inaugurated an industrial revolution. The Hudson River School ultimately helped shape an American identity.

Landscaping People

Since the early Renaissance, artists have regularly enhanced portraits with painted landscapes. In addition to their decorative appearance, landscapes impart a wealth of information about the individuals portrayed, including their social standing and aspirations, as well as information about the economic and political climate in which a portrait was painted. Artists have also incorporated landscapes to experiment with mood and feeling, to elicit emotional responses from viewers, and to reflect the psychological temperament of the sitter.

The cultural theorist W. J. T. Mitchell noted that landscape is “both a frame and what a frame contains,” meaning that landscape is both a framework of meaning—a structure that provides context and implication—and simultaneously the object of the viewer’s attention. But more importantly, the landscaped portrait unites man and nature in a setting the human presence dominates and controls. Artists of the Hudson River School likewise dominated and controlled nature; they painted the landscape to satisfy the expectations of patrons, the desires of the consumer market, and the prevailing ideals and cultural attitudes of the period. The portraits gathered in this section display landscapes as an integrated part of mankind’s identity—landscapes shaped and configured as well as admired and esteemed.

Abraham E. Wendell (b. 1715)

Attributed to John Heaton (active 1730-1745) | c. 1737

Medium: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 35 1/2 H x 29 5/8 W

Credit: Gift of Governor and Mrs. W. Averell Harriman, Dorothy Treat Arnold (Mrs. Ledyard) Cogswell, Jr., Gates B. and Bessie DeBeer Aufsesser and Richard C. and Marjorie D. Rockwell

In the eighteenth century, the Wendell family of Albany owned land just south town, in an area now set aside as Lincoln Park. A deep ravine with a swift-flowing stream named the Beaver Kill divided their landholdings, making it an ideal site for milling operations. This portrait of Abraham Wendell depicts a rare view with one of the family mills in the background.

In a will dated July 29, 1749, Abraham’s father, Evert Wendell, left the mills, the dwelling house, and all the land on both sides of the stream to Abraham. Evert also left specific instructions in his will that his sons Abraham and Philip “shall build a Chocolate mill for the use of my son Philip.” The mill represented in the portrait may have been retrofitted with chocolate milling apparatus, or a separate chocolate mill may have been built nearby. We cannot be certain whether the chocolate mill was ever built at all, but if Abraham was as “trusty, faithful, beloved, honest” as Evert’s will states, he probably would not have wanted to disobey his father’s last wishes.

The landscape in this portrait reveals much information about the young Abraham Wendell, his family’s business activities, and the design and construction of Dutch buildings in the Albany area. For Wendell, himself, the decision to have the family property included in his portrait reveals the pride he must have felt in his family’s accomplishments.

The Nepean Family of St. Just, Cornwall

Arthur Devis (1712–1787) | c. 1768

Medium: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 49 3/4 H x 39 3/4 W

Credit: Gift of Mary Taylor Moulton (Mrs. David C.) Hanrahan

Couple in a Mountain Landscape

Johan Zoffany (1733–1810) | c. 1779

Medium: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 29 3/4 H x 32 W

Credit: Gift of Mary Taylor (Mrs. David C.) Hanrahan

The handsome couple in this painting form a stark contrast to the rugged landscape in which they pose. There is tension present in this work between their affectionate deportment and elegant attire, and the overcast gloom of the valley beyond—a tension between fascination and fear. Johan Zoffany’s portrait reflects the emotional conflict common to European romanticism.

The German-born Zoffany led a peripatetic life that took him from Regensburg to Rome, London, Florence, Parma, and the Indian sub-continent. Throughout his long and varied career, he painted allegorical works, portraits, theatrical pictures, conversation pieces, and genre scenes. He painted King George III of England and his wife Charlotte, the Grand Duke of Tuscany Pietro Leopoldo, the acclaimed English actor David Garrick, and the ruler of Oudh, India, Asaf-ud-daula. To say he was a society painter captures only part of Zoffany’s celebrity. His paintings captivate viewers with their attention to detail, lively animation, and rich colors. The English connoisseur and antiquarian Horace Walpole declared Zoffany one of the three great English painters of his time (the other two being Sir Joshua Reynolds and Thomas Gainsborough); yet until recently, much of his life remained a mystery.

The couple in the portrait have long been identified as Samuel Blunt (1723–1800) and his second wife Winifrid Scawen (b. 1742), but evidence does not support the claim. The couple’s clothing suggests a date in the late 1770s or early 1780s, which would place Blunt in his mid-50s. The uniformed man in the painting, however, appears to be much younger in age. There also exists another painting by Zoffany of a man identified as Samuel Blunt, but the individual in that portrait shows no resemblance to the man in this painting. Furthermore, Samuel Blunt was not in the military, although his oldest son Robert was an officer in the Royal Horse Guards. Even though Robert died in 1780 before marrying, the couple may represent Robert and some unidentified female.

Major (Charles Temple) Dix (1838-1873)

George Gerhard (1830-1902) | 1865

Medium: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 50 3/4 H x 36 1/8 W

Credit: Albany Institute of History & Art Purchase

At the end of the American Civil War, Major Charles Temple Dix of the 14th Regiment, New York Volunteer Infantry, posed for his portrait with the German-born artist George Gerhard. Dix was an artist himself, who began painting during the early 1850s before attending Union College in Schenectady, New York. He started exhibiting at the National Academy of Design in 1857, and in 1861 was elected an associate. The Civil War temporarily curtailed his activities, but he continued to pursue his interest in painting marine views after the conflict ended.

In this full-length portrait, Dix towers over the landscape. The thin thread of water in the distance most likely represents the Hudson River, and the rocky ledge on which he stands the eastern extension of the Helderberg escarpment south of Albany. By placing Dix in the Hudson River valley, the portrait associates him with the Hudson River School, from which he drew inspiration as an artist.

Erastus Corning I at Kenwood

Unidentified artist | c. 1871

Medium: Oil on canvas

Dimensions: 26 1/2 H x 21 1/2 W, Framed 33 H x 28 W

Credit: Gift of the three daughters of E. Corning Rawle: Mary R. Halliwell, Patricia R. Rowe and Elizabeth R. McManus

At the end of the American Civil War, Major Charles Temple Dix of the 14th Regiment, New York Volunteer Infantry, posed for his portrait with the German-born artist George Gerhard. Dix was an artist himself, who began painting during the early 1850s before attending Union College in Schenectady, New York. He started exhibiting at the National Academy of Design in 1857, and in 1861 was elected an associate. The Civil War temporarily curtailed his activities, but he continued to pursue his interest in painting marine views after the conflict ended.

In this full-length portrait, Dix towers over the landscape. The thin thread of water in the distance most likely represents the Hudson River, and the rocky ledge on which he stands the eastern extension of the Helderberg escarpment south of Albany. By placing Dix in the Hudson River valley, the portrait associates him with the Hudson River School, from which he drew inspiration as an artist.

Walter Launt Palmer and Companions

Unidentified photographer

Albumen photographic print on card, 1874

Albany Institute of History & Art Library, BV 448

This beautifully composed photograph of Walter Launt Palmer (1854–1932), seated to the left of the large tree, and his traveling companions was almost certainly taken during the spring of 1874 in the forest of Fontainebleau, located about thirty-seven miles southeast of Paris. The American Cyclopædia, published that same year, noted that the forest’s “varied and picturesque scenery is highly appreciated by travelers and landscape painters.” Most certainly Palmer wanted to see the forest for himself.

The young man was just beginning his career as a painter and had already studied with Hudson River School artist Frederic Edwin Church (1826–1900) before accompanying his father, the Albany sculptor Erastus Dow Palmer, and other family members on a trip to Europe. (His father planned to model and cast in Paris his bronze statue of Robert R. Livingston, commissioned for Statuary Hall at the Capitol in Washington.)

Palmer’s photograph is a travel souvenir. It captures him beside one of the forest’s famed beech trees, thus validating his visit and reminding him of the popular destination, but more importantly,

Scroll down to view additional content